The areas in Essex where 43,000 new homes could be built after initial plans were rejected

The+areas+in+Essex+where+43%2C000+new+homes+could+be+built+after+initial+plans+were+rejected
Defunct plans for a 43,000-home garden village in north Essex could be revived in the wake of Labour’s housing pledges. Braintree District Council leader, Councillor Graham Butland, has expressed frustration that large parts of the garden village plans between Uttlesford and Tending were rejected in 2020 after a government inspector ruled they were unworkable.Defunct plans for a 43,000-home garden village in north Essex could be revived in the wake of Labour’s housing pledges. Braintree District Council leader, Councillor Graham Butland, has expressed frustration that large parts of the garden village plans between Uttlesford and Tending were rejected in 2020 after a government inspector ruled they were unworkable. However, Councillor Butland said he had asked his officials to investigate an announcement by Finance Minister Rachel Reeves, who stressed her commitment to building 1.5 million new homes before the next election and said a revision of planning rules was holding back construction in Britain. This means that at least parts of the North Essex Garden Community project – which included a total of 43,000 homes along the North Essex A120 corridor, with significant employment opportunities and transformative new infrastructure – could be re-examined. Butland emphasized his commitment to building communities rather than just houses, stating that local authorities were planning something different by taking land value away from developers to invest in infrastructure. Following a public inquiry, a planning inspector concluded that only the Tendring and Colchester borders Garden Community was viable and deliverable, while the other two proposed communities were not. However, the mood in government has changed since Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves confirmed Labour’s pledge to build 1.5 million new homes. The government plans to review planning rules, allow new developments on some parts of the green belt, and prioritize brownfield and grey belt land for housing, including affordable and social housing. Councillor Butland stated that he is open to discussions with the government to alleviate the housing crisis in his district, emphasizing the need to provide housing for those on the waiting list and young people living with their parents.

Defunct plans for a 43,000-home garden village in north Essex could be revived in the wake of Labour’s housing pledges. Braintree District Council leader, Councillor Graham Butland, has expressed frustration that large parts of the garden village plans between Uttlesford and Tending were rejected in 2020 after a government inspector ruled they were unworkable.

However, Councillor Butland said he had asked his officials to investigate an announcement by Finance Minister Rachel Reeves, who stressed her commitment to building 1.5 million new homes before the next election and said a revision of planning rules was holding back construction in Britain.

This means that at least parts of the North Essex Garden Community project – which included a total of 43,000 homes along the North Essex A120 corridor, with significant employment opportunities and transformative new infrastructure – could be re-examined.

Read more: The ‘scandalous’ Essex road that is ‘like a car park’ due to severe traffic congestion

Read more: The Essex town that ‘has it all’ with links to Churchill and major celebrities

He said: “I said then that this was the biggest piece of local government socialism I had ever been involved in. And that was because it meant that the local authorities – Braintree, Colchester and Tendring – were planning something different.

“We weren’t just planning concrete houses. We were taking the land value away from developers to put infrastructure in. We were planning a community, not just building houses. That’s the difference – I want to build communities, not just houses.

“If we have a government that wants to do the same, I’m open to whatever they have. I know it’s going to irritate some of the people we irritated last time and we got a lot of criticism, but unfortunately a planning inspector who was six months away from retirement decided otherwise. I realise some people don’t want homes, but then they have to be accountable for what they do to homelessness in the area and future generations.”

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *