The legal implications of distracted driving laws can be complex and confusing for both drivers and law enforcement officers. Attorney Schiavoni highlights the challenges faced by the courts in interpreting these laws, particularly due to vague language and ambiguities.The legal implications of distracted driving laws can be complex and confusing for both drivers and law enforcement officers. Attorney Schiavoni highlights the challenges faced by the courts in interpreting these laws, particularly due to vague language and ambiguities. Schiavoni emphasizes that the core principle of distracted driving laws is the prohibition against holding a phone in one’s hand while driving, except for hands-free conversations. However, the interpretation and enforcement of this principle can vary depending on the specific wording of the law in each jurisdiction. The vagueness and ambiguities in distracted driving laws can lead to inconsistent application and confusion among drivers. Officers may have difficulty determining whether a driver is using their phone inappropriately, while drivers may be uncertain about what constitutes a violation. Schiavoni’s statement underscores the need for clear and concise distracted driving laws that provide明確且簡潔的法律，這些法律提供明確的行為指南 both drivers and officers. This would help to reduce confusion, ensure consistent enforcement, and ultimately improve road safety.
“The courts are still trying to figure out the ropes because there are some vague parts to it. There are some ambiguities and it’s confusing for both drivers and officers,” Schiavoni said. “The crux of the matter is you can’t have your phone in your hand to do anything other than talk on it, and if you
